<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for StupidProgrammer.com</title>
	<atom:link href="http://stupidprogrammer.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://stupidprogrammer.com</link>
	<description>"Stupid Programmer You Are" --Master Programmer Yoda</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 03:44:08 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on User Already Exists in the Current Database? by Allen</title>
		<link>http://stupidprogrammer.com/2009/02/20/user-already-exists-in-the-current-database/comment-page-1/#comment-215</link>
		<dc:creator>Allen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 03:44:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stupidprogrammer.com/?p=373#comment-215</guid>
		<description>Thanks! It worked as written. 
 Cause: I created a test database on the same SQL server and loaded Production into it. When I tried connecting the user &quot;A&quot; to test it said &quot;A&quot; already exsits. 
 Solution: run your code as above, then reconnect the user. So far so good. 
  Thank you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks! It worked as written.<br />
 Cause: I created a test database on the same SQL server and loaded Production into it. When I tried connecting the user &#8220;A&#8221; to test it said &#8220;A&#8221; already exsits.<br />
 Solution: run your code as above, then reconnect the user. So far so good.<br />
  Thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on User Already Exists in the Current Database? by pablo</title>
		<link>http://stupidprogrammer.com/2009/02/20/user-already-exists-in-the-current-database/comment-page-1/#comment-214</link>
		<dc:creator>pablo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 23:26:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stupidprogrammer.com/?p=373#comment-214</guid>
		<description>Great post, I was looking for this answer for some time ago, I even wrote it on my blog and gave you credit, of course:

http://www.viale.mx/2010/01/08/user-group-or-role-already-exists-in-the-current-database/

THANKS!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post, I was looking for this answer for some time ago, I even wrote it on my blog and gave you credit, of course:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.viale.mx/2010/01/08/user-group-or-role-already-exists-in-the-current-database/" rel="nofollow" onclick="urchinTracker('/outgoing/www.viale.mx/2010/01/08/user-group-or-role-already-exists-in-the-current-database/?referer=');">http://www.viale.mx/2010/01/08/user-group-or-role-already-exists-in-the-current-database/</a></p>
<p>THANKS!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on SQL on Windows 2008 Server Remote Connection Issue by pablo</title>
		<link>http://stupidprogrammer.com/2009/08/24/sql-on-windows-2008-server-remote-connection-issue/comment-page-1/#comment-213</link>
		<dc:creator>pablo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 23:24:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stupidprogrammer.com/2009/08/24/sql-on-windows-2008-server-remote-connection-issue/#comment-213</guid>
		<description>The firewall in windows server 2008 is scary.  Not to mention that they removed the functionality to transfer data from one external port to an internal one.  For example, for SMTP, receive on external port 587 (for the clients to work properly) and then transfer the request to internal port 25 (so the mail server can process it).

Sorry if I went off-topic, but I am bitter about that, I had to downgrade to win server 2003 just because of that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The firewall in windows server 2008 is scary.  Not to mention that they removed the functionality to transfer data from one external port to an internal one.  For example, for SMTP, receive on external port 587 (for the clients to work properly) and then transfer the request to internal port 25 (so the mail server can process it).</p>
<p>Sorry if I went off-topic, but I am bitter about that, I had to downgrade to win server 2003 just because of that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on User Already Exists in the Current Database? by Pablo Viale &#187; Blog Archive &#187; User, group, or role already exists in the current database.</title>
		<link>http://stupidprogrammer.com/2009/02/20/user-already-exists-in-the-current-database/comment-page-1/#comment-212</link>
		<dc:creator>Pablo Viale &#187; Blog Archive &#187; User, group, or role already exists in the current database.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 23:21:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stupidprogrammer.com/?p=373#comment-212</guid>
		<description>[...] Referencia: Stupid Programmer. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Referencia: Stupid Programmer. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on TimeSpan.TotalMinutes vs. TimeSpan.Minutes by Robert</title>
		<link>http://stupidprogrammer.com/2006/02/15/timespantotalminutes-vs-timespanminutes/comment-page-1/#comment-211</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 15:33:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stupidprogrammer.com/PermaLink,guid,75c36e86-9c4c-48be-91a0-747855b7d5ab.aspx#comment-211</guid>
		<description>Easy mistake to make.  

Searching for &quot;TimeSpan minutes&quot; brings up your page and, since I didn&#039;t notice &quot;TotalMinutes&quot; in intellisense, this was helpful to point it out.   Thanks for posting!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Easy mistake to make.  </p>
<p>Searching for &#8220;TimeSpan minutes&#8221; brings up your page and, since I didn&#8217;t notice &#8220;TotalMinutes&#8221; in intellisense, this was helpful to point it out.   Thanks for posting!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on SQL Server 2005 and AWE by joshua22</title>
		<link>http://stupidprogrammer.com/2008/09/24/sql-server-2005-and-awe/comment-page-1/#comment-210</link>
		<dc:creator>joshua22</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 06:42:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stupidprogrammer.com/?p=321#comment-210</guid>
		<description>thanks for this info...

i just have some more questions... 

150GB - Database in 410GB Harddisk raid 5
26GB Memory

1. do i need to configure the min and max memory?
2. do i have to separate the .mdf and .ldf file?
3. who are the users that i am going to include in the &quot;Lock Pages Memory&quot;? do i need to include all the users? 

thanks in advance</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks for this info&#8230;</p>
<p>i just have some more questions&#8230; </p>
<p>150GB &#8211; Database in 410GB Harddisk raid 5<br />
26GB Memory</p>
<p>1. do i need to configure the min and max memory?<br />
2. do i have to separate the .mdf and .ldf file?<br />
3. who are the users that i am going to include in the &#8220;Lock Pages Memory&#8221;? do i need to include all the users? </p>
<p>thanks in advance</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on SQL Server 2005 and AWE by Amit</title>
		<link>http://stupidprogrammer.com/2008/09/24/sql-server-2005-and-awe/comment-page-1/#comment-207</link>
		<dc:creator>Amit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 10:27:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stupidprogrammer.com/?p=321#comment-207</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the straight forward article. But a little more about the /3GB would have helped.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the straight forward article. But a little more about the /3GB would have helped.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The remote server returned an error: (501) Not Implemented by admin</title>
		<link>http://stupidprogrammer.com/2007/02/28/the-remote-server-returned-an-error-501-not-implemented/comment-page-1/#comment-206</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 20:51:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stupidprogrammer.com/PermaLink,guid,910cbf68-d7fe-41ad-9f42-ad7a9ca8b345.aspx#comment-206</guid>
		<description>Dawn,
Sorry... I don&#039;t.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dawn,<br />
Sorry&#8230; I don&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The remote server returned an error: (501) Not Implemented by Dawn</title>
		<link>http://stupidprogrammer.com/2007/02/28/the-remote-server-returned-an-error-501-not-implemented/comment-page-1/#comment-205</link>
		<dc:creator>Dawn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 18:22:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stupidprogrammer.com/PermaLink,guid,910cbf68-d7fe-41ad-9f42-ad7a9ca8b345.aspx#comment-205</guid>
		<description>I get this error and my WebDAV is implemented.  Also followed your instructions for 64 bit.

Any additional suggestions?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I get this error and my WebDAV is implemented.  Also followed your instructions for 64 bit.</p>
<p>Any additional suggestions?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on SQL Server 2005 and AWE by Umit</title>
		<link>http://stupidprogrammer.com/2008/09/24/sql-server-2005-and-awe/comment-page-1/#comment-204</link>
		<dc:creator>Umit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 20:34:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stupidprogrammer.com/?p=321#comment-204</guid>
		<description>Great job, guys. You saved me lots of of time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great job, guys. You saved me lots of of time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
